OMER BESE

Omer Bese

Energy Systems Engineer  .  Founder turned Operator  .  Open Source Builder

scroll

While everyone is building in public, I am JOB HUNTING in public.

I share the companies and positions I've applied to, what I learned while researching them, and what I would do if I got the role. #ApplyingInPublic

"I am looking for a place that I failed to create for myself as a founder, where I am surrounded by challenging minds who share the same enthusiasm, hunger, and a bit of frustration to dismantle the things that aren't working and build the things that do."

Jason Calacanis broke both his "No Solo Founders" and "No Service Businesses" rules to write the first check.

Amazon Medical Device Launch in 3 Months. Category avg: 10-16 months. 90% rejection rate. Got called back 6 months later asking how.

30% Electricity Bill Drop at the Jonathan Club after a 2-day LED upgrade.

180-Person Waitlist at Bonjuur. Built by cleaning houses myself for 6 months, mapping every bottleneck, and redesigning workflows from the ground up.

The Human
Why?
Omer Bese

I built my life around a simple question: "Why?"

That pursuit led me to become an unapologetic vitalist with just enough audacity to paint a giant mural of my own face in my living room, yet somehow still not "too good" to clean houses myself every weekday for six months for my startup.

I have a relentless curiosity and often find inspiration in obscurity, like the fact that we invented four-wheeled luggage after stepping on the moon. However, frustration often follows as we fail to evolve the status quo alongside inventions just like keeping the vertical design even though it creates significant instability with the added wheels.

I am equally baffled by things that make no sense at all as simple as pedal trash cans next to toilets, placed as if your foot can reach the lever while you are seated.

I usually don't like revolution, as it proves a lack of evolution. But looking at the current energy landscape, I am irritated by how stagnant the industry is. I am frustrated with incompetent incentive programs. I am appalled by asset-based delivery charges. I am tired of policies protecting monopolies, and mostly, of policymakers who act only when the lights go out.

I have worked in our family business, a small company, an NGO, and a startup, and finally, as a full-time founder. I can easily say I thrive in a startup environment, though I am not naive enough to do it solo anymore. I am looking for a place that I failed to create for myself as a founder, where I am surrounded by challenging minds who share the same enthusiasm, hunger, and a bit of frustration to dismantle the things that aren't working and build the things that do.

The curse of monopolies is that technology has evolved so fast that the laws protecting them are finally crumbling, and indeed lights did go out. This gives me the thrill of being part of rewriting the game and driving that much-needed revolution.

Still reading?

Let's talk →

I am a Polyglot

I am not proficient in all of these languages. But with closed captions, I am fluent enough to communicate with the native speakers.

I speak engineering;
So I wonder why we accept "defaults" without questioning them. Every "standard" spec was once someone's best guess that got frozen into practice. When I look at any system (electrical, mechanical, software) my first question is; what constraint set this default, and has that constraint changed? Breaking the status quo is much easier when you question assumptions nobody revisits.
I speak operations;
So I wonder why so many field service industries still send their most expensive, licensed specialist to handle the full job when 70% of the work requires no license at all. Henry Ford didn't invent the assembly line. He stole it from slaughterhouses in Chicago that decoupled the master butcher from volume labor. Splitting skilled from unskilled work is the oldest throughput hack in the book, and it's hiding in plain sight across energy, construction, and HVAC.
I speak thermodynamics;
So I wonder from first principles; Should we aim to consume less before we store or generate more? The most valuable kilowatt-hour is the one you never have to produce. Reducing a building's peak demand by even 2-3 kW through passive upgrades (attic insulation R-49, aerosol duct sealing, ECM blower motor swap) can actually make your home "Thermal Battery" at a fraction of the cost of new hardware.
I speak finance;
So I wonder why more infrastructure companies don't hedge volatile market revenue with bankable long-term contracts in adjacent markets. High-beta volatility is exciting on a spreadsheet but terrifying to a lender. Pairing it with fixed, multi-year capacity agreements in regulated markets is how you get the cost of capital down and the deployment velocity up. The two structures are natural complements that most companies treat as "either/or" while the stable answer is "and".
I speak policy;
So I wonder why the split incentive problem (where the person who pays for an upgrade isn't the person who benefits) still paralyzes entire sectors. Renters, tenants, landlords, utilities: everyone points at someone else. And since none of the individuals are gaining, whole society loses. But when you look at the world you can find tried and done answers to your problems for example Sweden solved it with "Warm Rent." The U.S. hasn't even tried. The policy fix often exists; the political will doesn't.
I speak legal;
So I wonder why companies building vertically don't structure their corporate entities to match the stack. Manufacturing, installation, retail, and software each carry fundamentally different liability profiles. Isolating them into separate LLCs doesn't just lower insurance premiums. It unlocks R&D tax credits and grant eligibility that a monolithic structure would miss entirely.

In a nutshell, I speak lots of languages. While I am not proficient in all of them, with closed captions I am fluent enough to communicate with the native speakers. I am simply looking for a place where this "unnecessary" curiosity is actually a prerequisite.

Columbia to Startups to Energy

Columbia to startups to energy. The thread connecting all of it: an obsession with building systems from scratch and making them efficient, whether in buildings, supply chains, or business models.

Education

Columbia University

M.S. Sustainability Management  |  2015-2016  |  New York

Solar Project Development, Smart Cities, Energy Markets & Innovation, GHG Emissions & Carbon Footprint.

Capstone: Reducing Milk Waste in NYC with WWF. My solution was rejected by all 9 teammates, then selected for implementation.

Istanbul Bilgi University

B.S. Energy Systems Engineering  |  2010-2014

Energy Efficient Building Design, Solar Energy, Wind Energy, Nuclear Energy, Geothermal Energy.

Thesis on Geothermal Power Systems. Flew to the Stanford Geothermal Workshop and persuaded Ormat Technologies to share proprietary data our government didn't have.

Career

Bonjuur, Founder & Janitor
2022-Present  |  NY > LA Timeshare subscription of a full-time housekeeper for daily micro-visits. Built a 180-person waitlist by cleaning houses myself 6 months every weekday, mapping bottlenecks, redesigning workflows, and building systems from the ground up. Secured first investment check from Jason Calacanis. He broke both his "No Solo Founders" and "No Service Businesses" rules. Raised $90K total. First customer: Jordan Fliegel, MD of Techstars NYC, right after rejecting me. Pivoted to AI House Manager (bodycams + Vision AI). Navigated the Trough of Sorrow. Returned to energy.
Tulip Haus, Co-Founder
2020-2025  |  New York Artisan home decor from Turkey. Days from signing NYC retail lease when COVID hit. Pivoted to e-commerce. First container hit by crane in Spain, marine law shipping insurance doesn't cover shipyard faults. B2C failed. Survived via B2B.
SpiroHome, Business Developer
2019  |  Ankara Medical IoT. Oversaw FDA clearance. Launched Amazon UK/EU in "Medical Device II" category in 3 months (usually 10-16 months, 90% rejection rate). Got called 6 months later asking how I managed Amazon.
Istanbul Chamber of Industry, Energy & Environment
2018-2019 Initiated program supplying industrial measurement devices to university students for energy efficiency analyses on member factories. Learned bureaucracy takes a full year to launch a basic program.
NULARIS, Energy Efficiency Engineer
2016-2017  |  Los Angeles Audited buildings for the LADWP CLIP incentive program. Replaced half the lightbulbs at the Jonathan Club. 30% electricity bill drop after a 2-day LED upgrade.

Fellowships & Community

On Deck #ODF17 (2023)  |  All-In Summit Volunteer (2023)  |  Angel Squad / Hustle Fund (2021)  |  Camp Lightbulb nonprofit (2024-Present)

Energy Tools

ManorOS

iOS Home Energy Auditor

An open-source home energy assessment tool that uses LiDAR room scanning via Apple RoomPlan, HVAC equipment logging with on-device OCR via Apple Vision, appliance detection, window assessment, and ACCA Manual J BTU calculations. Generates tiered upgrade recommendations with payback periods and battery synergy insights. Thesis: An inefficient building envelope directly cannibalizes home battery ROI during peak grid events ($2,000-$5,000/MWh).

Swift, SwiftUI, SwiftData, ARKit, RoomPlan, AVFoundation, Vision OCR, CoreLocation, PDFKit
GitHub

CellSense

Battery ROI Calculator

Compare Tesla Powerwall 3, Enphase IQ 5P, Pila Mesh, and Base Power side-by-side. Supports 16 utilities, 32 rate plans, NEM 3.0, VPP earnings projections for ELRP, ConnectedSolutions, ERCOT.

Pure vanilla JavaScript. Zero dependencies. Dark glassmorphism UI with canvas-based charts.
GitHub

HazShip

Lithium Battery HAZMAT Shipping Classifier

Encodes the entire regulatory decision tree for 49 CFR 173.185, IATA DGR 66th Edition, and IMDG Code Amendment 42-24. Outputs UN numbers, packing instructions, labels, documentation checklists. Built from direct experience shipping lithium-ion medical devices through FDA clearance.

SwiftUI (iOS 17+). Pure engine pattern. Zero dependencies. Fully offline.
GitHub

Deep Dives & Published Writing

For those who want the full analysis. 60+ hours of primary source research. All numbers cited. Nothing softened.

What I Learned About Base Power

60+ hours of primary source research across ERCOT filings, Potomac Economics, Modo Energy, CPUC, CAISO, IRS guidance, and Base Power's own spec pages.

The Gentailer Model. Actually Executed.
Most battery companies sell you an $18,000 box and disappear. Base Power does not. Starting $695 upfront. $19/month. They own the hardware. You get backup power and a lower electricity bill. They eat the arbitrage and virtual power plant revenue. Simple pitch. But there is a specific structural reason it works when everyone running a similar thesis has failed. "Gentailer" means you're the generator and the retailer simultaneously. In Texas's deregulated ERCOT market, most REPs buy power at wholesale prices and sell at fixed rates. When prices spike, retailers bleed. Generators love those spikes. Base Power owns both sides of that trade: the battery is the generation asset, the customer relationship is the retail contract. The same price event that hits the retail book prints money in the dispatch book. That internal hedge is why the unit economics hold when they should not. The customer pays once. Gets whole-home backup. Gets below-market energy rates. Base owns the distributed energy asset and collects grid revenue from wholesale dispatch around the clock. The subscription alone runs $228 to $348 per home per year. Grid trading sits on top of that.
The Cost Basis. Not the Technology.
Base does not manufacture batteries. They assemble them. CATL makes the lithium iron phosphate cells in China. Base imports those cells at roughly $55/kWh and assembles at a 90,000 sq ft facility in Austin. Off-the-shelf integrators buy finished modules at around $100/kWh. Result: Base's 25 kWh single-unit system costs roughly $2,500 to $3,000 to build versus $6,000 to $8,000 for comparable off-the-shelf configurations. Cell fabrication is a commodity race they cannot win and do not try to. They control stages 3 through 5: module assembly, pack integration, proprietary inverter. Ford did not invent the assembly line. He borrowed the concept from Chicago slaughterhouses where master butchers were the production bottleneck. Base did the same thing. The factory exists to make the installer stupid-fast. The bottleneck was never manufacturing. It is installation crews.
The IRA. Working Capital Flywheel.
Section 48E ITC gives 30% back on Fair Market Value, not on COGS. COGS is roughly $3,000. Retail fair market value is roughly $10,000. The 30% credit returns approximately $3,000 per unit. The hardware effectively pays for itself before the customer writes a check. US assembly triggers the domestic content adder, pushing the total investment tax credit toward 40%. Section 6418 transferability closes the loop. Base can sell those credits immediately at 91 to 94 cents on the dollar. Deploy, generate credit, sell, redeploy. That is the working capital engine behind deployment velocity.
The Inverter. Not a Commodity.
Base publishes 11.4 kW max continuous real power for both the single-unit 25 kWh system and the dual-unit 50 kWh system. SolarEdge and Enphase are designed for solar self-consumption. Wrong tool for this job. Base needs bidirectional, millisecond-latency, grid-forming power electronics that auto-switch in under 0.5 seconds. Why 11.4 kW matters in ERCOT: the real-time SWCAP sits at $2,000/MWh. The day-ahead SWCAP is $5,000/MWh. During those events, 11.4 kW dispatching versus a competitor's 5 kW is the difference between full revenue capture and watching half the value disappear. The inverter is the monetization engine.
The ERCOT Revenue Collapse. And What Survived.
ERCOT battery storage grew from under 1 GW in 2021 to approximately 13.9 GW by early 2026. ECRS clearing prices fell from $76.77/MWh in 2023 to $9.62/MWh in 2024: an 87% collapse. Total battery revenue fell 75 to 78%. Companies that built their model on ancillary service revenue with $8,000 system COGS are finished. Base survives because their cost basis is below $3,000. The 4CP peak billing optimization does not care what ancillary prices are doing. The ADER program: ERCOT expanded the Aggregated Distributed Energy Resources cap to 200 MW system-wide. December 2025: ERCOT launched Real-Time Co-optimization plus Batteries.
Volatility Paradox. Hoax.
The conventional narrative: more batteries suppress the price spikes that justify building batteries. But the ERCOT large-load interconnection queue shows approximately 233 GW of pending new load. AI data centers, EV charging, and industrial electrification could add 20 to 30 GW of flat, continuous baseload demand. If this materializes faster than storage grows, the reserve margin compresses back toward sub-15%, where scarcity events become frequent again and batteries print money.
The Funding. AC vs DC.
$1.3 billion total. $1 billion Series C in October 2025, led by Addition at a $4 billion valuation. Andreessen Horowitz, Lightspeed, Thrive, CapitalG, and Ribbit all participated. The Warren Buffett inside me is screaming, "Sunrun!" Volatility is the middle name of this game. It seems like anything that touches electricity eventually copies its sine wave. Here's hoping Base's valuation adopts DC.

What I Would Do at Base Power

The ERCOT revenue collapse is well-documented. 87% drop in ancillary service clearing prices. Companies carrying $8,000 system COGS are done. Base Power is not, because they verticalized hard and early. But verticalization is a direction, not a destination. Here is what I would do next. Actual numbers, because strategic frameworks without specifics are just opinions.

The Thermal Battery: Liberating an extra 2 kW
There is a framing problem costing Base money every day. The battery is competing with the home for power. Both systems are capped at 11.4 kW continuous output. EXPORT CAPACITY = 11.4 kW - HOUSE LOAD. A standard Texas home draws 5 to 6 kW on a summer afternoon. By liberating an extra 2 kW per home through passive upgrades (attic insulation R-49, aerosol duct sealing, ECM blower motor swap), Base yields 33% to 40% more export capacity from the exact same hardware. Across a 30,000-home fleet this translates to $2.4M to $6.0M in additional annual revenue.
The Moat. Decoupled Installation.
Base's install schedule is broken into specialized nodes. Phase 1: Material Drop-off alongside battery hardware. Phase 2: Parallel Workflow where unlicensed insulation crew works inside while electrical crew works outside. Phase 3: Cleanup. Zero additional customer acquisition cost and zero extra truck rolls. This structural advantage saves $650 to $1,100 per home. At 40 installs/day with a 30% upsell rate, that generates a $2M to $3M annual operational advantage.
California. The Financial Arbitrage.
Texas: SOFR + 350-450 bps, 50% LTV. California's Resource Adequacy: SOFR + 175-250 bps, up to 75-80% LTV. Same cells. Same inverter. Different contract. On a blended $100M portfolio this saves $900k to $1.5M annually in interest expense. San Diego entry via SDG&E rates ($0.39-$0.40/kWh) and CCA partnerships.
The Capital Flywheel
California offers the steady, predictable "Direct Current" of regulated returns, shielding Base Power from the troughs of Texas's wild "Alternating Current" while letting them bank the crests.

Let's Talk

West Hollywood, CA